PMO Complaint Seeks Examination of Dubai Firm’s Alleged Links to Mahadev App Case

New Delhi, September 20, 2026: A complaint submitted to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) has called for an examination of the incorporation and functioning of Dubai-based Inner Bloom Ventures LLC and its alleged corporate and financial links involving businessman Jawahar Kotwani, his son Ankit Kotwani and individuals associated with the Mahadev App investigation.

The representation, which carries an official receipt stamp dated September 7, 2026, seeks scrutiny of the company’s reported financial activities, cross-border transactions and certain employment-related arrangements. The complaint also requests verification of whether any financial or corporate relationship exists between the Dubai-based entity and individuals whose names have figured in investigations connected with the Mahadev App case.

Among the matters referred to in the complaint is the alleged involvement of Jawahar Kotwani in the process of establishing Inner Bloom Ventures LLC. The representation states that Kotwani approached an individual identified as Sachin Sharma in Dubai for assistance with the company’s formation.

The complaint also refers to purported WhatsApp communications involving an individual identified as “AK”, whom the complainant identifies as Ankit Kotwani. According to the representation, the communications relate to administrative and incorporation-related matters concerning the Dubai entity.

Another document cited in the complaint allegedly lists an email attributed to Jawahar Kotwani as an approving manager’s email in connection with an application submitted through the SHAMS portal. The authenticity and context of these documents, however, remain matters for verification.

The representation also draws attention to proposed employment arrangements concerning Dheeraj Ahuja. According to the documents cited by the complainant, communications relating to his employment and visa formalities were processed through Inner Bloom Ventures LLC. The documents reportedly describe the proposed position as Sales Executive, with remuneration of AED 50,000 and a two-year employment contract.

The complaint links these employment-related documents to questions surrounding Dheeraj Ahuja’s reported association with the wider Mahadev App investigation. It cites media reports and other material while requesting that the relevant authorities independently verify the nature and extent of any such connections.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has previously charge-sheeted Dheeraj Ahuja and Vishal Ahuja, among others, in a corruption case connected with the Mahadev App. In a July 2026 release, the agency stated that the case involved provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act as well as offences relating to cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy.

Against this backdrop, the complainant has sought an examination of whether any corporate or financial nexus exists between Inner Bloom Ventures LLC, the Kotwanis, the Ahuja brothers and other individuals who have figured in investigations relating to the Mahadev App.

The representation has also requested scrutiny of the alleged money trail, including possible cross-border transactions and any potential use of the Dubai-based entity in receiving, transferring or routing funds. Such questions, if taken up by the authorities, would require examination of financial records and other documentary evidence before any conclusions can be drawn.

The documents listed alongside the complaint reportedly include purported WhatsApp conversations, bank-transfer records, Emirates ID and passport documents, as well as a voice message attributed to Sachin Sharma.

At this stage, the matters raised remain allegations and requests for verification contained in a complaint. The filing of a complaint or the submission of supporting documents does not, by itself, establish wrongdoing or criminal liability on the part of any individual or company. Any determination regarding the alleged corporate, financial or personal links would depend on independent examination by the competent authorities.

Disclaimer: This article is based on a complaint submitted to the PMO and reflects allegations that have not been independently verified. It should not be treated as a final finding by the PMO or any other authority.